The company SpaceX, or Space Exploration Technologies Corporation as it is more formally known, was the brainchild of Elon Musk, former CEO of Tesla Motors and one of the entrepreneurs behind online payment platform PayPal. Musk started the company with lofty ambitions including making reusable spacecraft that could come back from space and be easily set up for another journey, much like normal commercial jet planes, and even growing plants on Mars.
The California based company is a prestigious place for engineers and technicians to work, and has received a lot of praise over the achievements it has already made, including making deliveries to the International Space Station under contract from NASA.
However, not for the first time, SpaceX has come under fire legally over the way its staff are treated. A recent lawsuit filed by technician Stan Saporito claims that SpaceX expect hourly paid staff to continue working unpaid off the clock, and fail to provide meal and rest breaks required under California state law.
Stan Saporito’s Claims
Stan Saporito was, according to his own resume on LinkedIn, employed by SpaceX as a structures and integration technician from summer 2013 to February 2015. He claims that staff, including himself, were asked to round down the hours they had worked when filling out time reporting, and were required to perform some post shift tasks after clocking off, and therefore unpaid. The lawsuit also claims that the company did not make enough payable hours available to complete the work expected, and so staff were expected to continue working for free, even though they were employed on an hourly basis.
The lawsuit also claims that staff were not given the meal breaks required by the laws in California, and yet were still expected to fill out time sheets as if a meal break had been taken.
Saporito is asking for a trial by jury and is ultimately seeking $5 million in damages out of this class action lawsuit.
SpaceX have not yet formally responded to the lawsuit, and have 30 days from the date it was filed to do so.
This is an interesting case because it follows on from similar lawsuits against SpaceX and their treatment of staff, two in 2014 and one in 2015.
While some analysts say that working for cutting edge start ups, particularly in high profile industries like this, does create a competitive environment where the culture may actually trend towards people doing extra unpaid work or skipping breaks in a bid to get ahead, without the company sanctioning this behavior or demanding it, it is clear by the frequency and scale of class action lawsuits against SpaceX that something does need to be done about the way employees are seeing their company’s treatment of them.
It will be of interest to the engineering and tech industry as a whole to see if Saporito wins the damages he is asking for, and whether Elon Musk makes changes to how his organization operates.
Following the third of the Republican presidential candidate debates taking place in Boulder, Colorado, there were some stand out moments amongst the candidates. Some attempted to have their defining campaign moment, others threw punches, there were attacks on the anchors, and Donald Trump did Donald Trump things. Here is a brief description of some of the exchanges.
Economy The Economy was supposedly the main theme of the debate, with candidates laying out their vision for the future of America. Senator Mark Rubio lamented the state of the economy and its lack of well-paying jobs that were being created for hard-working Americans. Donald Trump rather predictably praised the reduction in corporation taxes, and Carly Fiorina explained how she felt the current economy was ran by big business for the benefit of the wealthy not the poorest in society. It looked as though on the crowded platform these three engaged in their own debate, side-lining the other candidates.
Bush vs Rubio
Jeb Bush seemingly put Marco Rubio in his line of fire, criticizing his attendance of senatorial debate whilst on
the campaign trail. Rubio deflected the attack, claiming his campaign was for the future of America and refused to be drawn into retaliation. Chris Christie took advantage of the anti-Bush rhetoric and lamented the former Governor of Florida for his recent comments on fantasy sports. There was some substance to the claims by Bush as figures show a missed vote percentage in the 34% ballpark. However, this fails to take into account the campaigns of then senators Barack Obama and current Secretary of State John Kerry, both of whom missed between sixty and seventy percent of both votes, so the numbers suggest Rubio is doing relatively well in that regard.
Ben Carson and Mannatech
A question aimed at the former surgeon focused on his involvement and apparent endorsement of a product which recently settled a $7 million claim for deceptive marketing. Whilst there were some endorsements of the product on the part of Carson who stated he took the pill and did some speeches for the company, he denied that he endorsed the drug as a treatment for serious illness. This was reaffirmed by Angie Holan of PolitiFact.
Carly Fiorina Targets Hilary Clinton
The former Hewlett-Packard CEO seemed determined to use her position as the only female candidate to her advantage. She took aim at former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton for her praise of the jobs program under President Obama claiming that during the first term of his regime ninety two percent of jobs lost were lost to women. This was a direct attack on Hilary Clinton who has sought to present herself as the champion of women in her quest to become the first woman to sit in the main chair of the Oval Office. Quite frankly, the claim is seemingly obscene. During President Obama’s first administration figures suggest the creation of four hundred thousand jobs so none of a ‘lost’ percentage could be attributed to women.
With these being only a few of the highlights from the debate, we look forward to more of Donald Trump’s pearls of wisdom at the next debate.
There are many ways of promoting your law firm into something good. The best way is to devise your own strategy and make it catchy and easy. Creating a good advertisement is a key top public relations and attracting your clients. They will work with you if you have a good price and a quality work. You should use all sorts of marketing into your gains in order to get popularity. You can make a commercials or some good advertisement campaign but the bad thing there is that you don’t know will you get good or any results. You don’t know your results in that way. The best way to promote yourself and to pay it as cheaply as you can is the Internet. Here you can promote yourself on all sorts of pages of social networks like Facebook or Twitter.
Advantages of these networks are numerous. Simply creating a page on the Facebook can give you an answer whether you are doing good or not. You can do some really quality work and your customers won’t go to you because they don’t know you. So present yourself to them in this way. Social networks are good when it comes to spreading news all around the world. So if there is something interesting that is easily shared and transferred. Make it interesting; create some interesting videos, pages etc. Videos can be presented as a cool commercial for your work and that can attract numerous amounts of people.
These social networks are public organizations. They are easily searchable which means that your business is easy to track. You can improve your public standing by this way. You should start your media and public relations by this way. Legal public relations can help you to improve image of your law firm and bring in new clients. You can set up your profile in that manner that all sorts of aspects can be easily searched and connected to you. This means that you will get promoted easily. These sorts of advertisement are very useful for journalists and companies etc.
One of the great benefits when it comes to this social networks and Internet advertisement is that you can track your progress. You can know at any moment how good you are and how far did you get. On your page you can see how many visitors you have every day. If you post some video commercial on YouTube you can see there your views etc. This will give you confidence in your work and most important bring to you all sorts of customers and clients.
This means good relations with public. Without that any firm in the world wouldn’t exist. Your goal is to get these relations bigger and bigger and your business will grow proportionally. It is important that you devise a plan for your campaigns and next moves. Knowing something in advance is always good when it comes to risks. Risk assessment is also very important. Improve your public standing every day and you will see how your business will grow.
Are you interested in how lawyers use social media/live streaming for business development? Check out the next 'Ask Andrew' show in 2 minutes! ...
Tune in to this month's #AskAndrew Show!
Title: How Divorce and Separation Affects Children and Relationships
Ask your family law question for free.
Andrew will be joined by special guest, Toronto Psychotherapist Roxanne DerRoxanne Derhodge, and will be discussing how divorce and separation affect children and other personal relationships.
To ask a question free of charge during the 30-minute show:
- Write a comment on the Feldstein Family Law Group Facebook page
- Send a text to 416-303-8307
- Email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Questions can be asked on a first-name basis or anonymously.
Hosted by Andrew Feldstein with Feldstein Family Law Group.
Creative Director, Mark Robins with Lawyerlocate.ca Inc.
Broadcast and remotely-produced by Robert Hix with Hixvideo in Gaithersburg, Maryland
#AskAndrew S3E5- How Divorce and Separation Affects Your Estate Planning.
Join host, Andrew Feldstein and special guest and Estate Planning Lawyer, Ian Hull as they discuss estate planning in the context of a divorce and separation.
Ian Hull is a Toronto, Ontario Lawyer, Certified Specialist in Estates and Trust Law, and Civil Litigation. For more information, please visit his Facebook page, Hull & Hull LLP or website at hullandhull.com/ .
The "Ask Andrew" program appears monthly on the Feldstein Family Law Group Facebook and YouTube Channels, as well as their website, www.separation.ca/ . The program is Facebook Live's first interactive program that allows you, the viewer, to ask questions and have them addressed during the LIVE broadcast.
Program management and marketing provided by Lawyerlocate.ca Inc
Broadcast and remotely-produced live by Hixvideo in Gaithersburg, Maryland.
“We think the court was wrong, Ezra Young said. “This was a situation where Dr. Tudor had a rare job, a tenure-track job, where you don't lose it no matter what. They tried to strip her of that and a jury agreed.
Michael Dreeben and Elizabeth Prelogar, both from the U.S. Solicitor General's Office, teamed up with Adam Jed, another Justice Department appellate specialist, to defend the criminal charges against Paul Manafort at a hearing Thursday in Washington's federal trial court.